Ex-Alabama Basketball Player Awarded $9.25 Million in Defamation Case Against the New York Times
Alabama Jury Awards $9.25 Million in Damages to Former Crimson Tide Basketball Player
An eight-person jury in Alabama has delivered a significant verdict in favor of former Crimson Tide basketball player Kai Spears, awarding him $9.25 million in damages against the New York Times for defamation.
The jury’s decision came after a lengthy trial, during which the Times was accused of publishing false and defamatory statements about Spears in 2023. The newspaper had reported that Spears was a passenger in a car involved in a fatal shooting that resulted in the death of 23-year-old Jamea Harris. Spears vehemently denied the allegations, stating that the report was ‘100% inaccurate’ and that the writer had ‘complete disregard for the truth.’
Spears, who began his college basketball career at Alabama as a walk-on before transferring to Marshall in 2024, expressed his gratitude to Alabama Athletics for refuting the allegations on his behalf. He also acknowledged the tragic circumstances surrounding the incident and the devastating impact it had on those involved.
A Timeline of the Defamation Case
- In 2023, the New York Times published a report stating that Spears was a passenger in a car involved in the fatal shooting of 23-year-old Jamea Harris.
- Spears denied the allegations, stating that the report was ‘100% inaccurate’ and that the writer had ‘complete disregard for the truth.’
- Alabama Athletics publicly refuted the allegations on Spears’ behalf.
- Spears transferred to Marshall in 2024, where he spent the last two seasons.
- The defamation case against the New York Times went to trial, with the jury ultimately awarding Spears $9.25 million in damages.
In a statement, Spears expressed his appreciation for the jury’s decision and the support he received from Alabama Athletics throughout the ordeal. He also reiterated his commitment to moving forward and continuing his basketball career.
The New York Times has not publicly commented on the verdict, but the publication has faced criticism in the past for its reporting on the incident and its handling of the defamation case.